A jurisprudência ampliativa sobre meio ambiente do Tribunal Europeu de Direitos Humanos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54829/revistacnj.v7i2.512Palavras-chave:
Obrigações positivas, Tribunal Europeu de Direitos Humanos, Convenção Europeia de Direitos Humanos, Meio ambiente, Direito ambiental, Jurisprudência internacionalResumo
A Convenção Europeia de Direitos Humanos de 1953 foi, inicialmente, elaborada para conferir proteção à um “grupo” delimitado de direitos, qual seja, os direitos civis e políticos. O artigo procura demonstrar como o desenvolvimento da jurisprudência do Tribunal Europeu de Direitos Humanos ampliou o escopo dos direitos garantidos na Convenção abarcando diversas dimensões ambientais. Esses julgados reconheceram que, para além das obrigações negativas, há uma série de obrigações positivas (substantivas e processuais) em matéria ambiental, que devem ser observadas pelos Estados-partes da Convenção Europeia de Direitos Humanos.
Downloads
Referências
ARRUDA, Paula Uematsu. Obrigações positivas na jurisprudência da Corte Europeia de Direitos Humanos: perspectivas para a efetividade dos direitos econômicos, sociais e culturais. Revista Inter, Rio de Janeiro, v. 4, n. 1, jan./jun. 2021. p 157-175. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/inter/article/view/39845. Acesso em: 14 dez. 2021.
AKANDJI-KOMBÉ, Jean François. Positive obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights: a guide to the implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights. Belgium: Council of Europe, 2007. (Human Rights handbooks, n. 7). Disponível em: http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/49f183a32.pdf. Acesso em: 2 fev. 2012.
ACESSO À INFORMAÇÃO, PARTICIPAÇÃO DO PÚBLICO E ACESSO À JUSTIÇA EM MATÉRIA DE AMBIENTE (CONVENÇÃO DE AARHUS). Website of the European Union, [s.l.], 5 mar. 2018. Disponível em: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM%3Al28056. Acesso em: 14 dez. 2021.
CONSELHO DA EUROPA (CE). Convenção Europeia dos Direitos do Homem: com as modificações introduzidas pelos protocolos nos. 11, 14, 15: acompanhados do Protocolo adicional e dos Protocolos nos. 4, 6, 7, 12, 13e 16. Strasbourg: HUDOC, CE, [s.d.]. Disponível em: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_por. Acesso em: 30 nov. 2023.
COUNCIL OF EUROPE (CE). Recommendation 1431 (1999). Future action to be taken by the Council of Europe in the field of environment protection. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, [1999]. Disponível em: http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=16731&lang=en. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2021.
COUNCIL OF EUROPE (CE). Committee of Ministers. CM (2003) 165. 867 Réunion, 8 janvier de 2004. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 9 décembre 2003a. Disponível em: https://rm.coe.int/16805de547. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2021.
COUNCIL OF EUROPE (CE). Recommendation 1614 (2003). Environment and Human Rights. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, [2003]b. Disponível em: https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=17131&lang=en. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2021.
COUNCIL OF EUROPE (CE). Recommendation 1885 (2009). Drafting an additional protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights concerning the right to a healthy environment. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, [2009]. Disponível em: https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=17777&lang=en. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2021.
COUNCIL OF EUROPE (CE). Manual on Human Rights and Environment. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2012. Disponível em: https://www.echr.coe.int/librarydocs/dh_dev_manual_environment_eng.pdf. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2021.
EIDE, Asbjorn. Economic, social, and cultural rights as Human Rights. In: EIDE, Asbjorn. KRAUSE, Catarina, ROSAS, Allan. Economic, social, and cultural rights: a textbook. Laiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (Merits). Case "relating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in belgium" (merits). Respondent State: Belgium. Judgment date: 23 jul. 1968. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 1968. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57525. Acesso em: 14 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (Merits). Case of Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom. Respondent State: United Kingdom. Judgment date: 21 fev. 1990. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 1990. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57622. Acesso em: 14 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction). Case of López Ostra v. Spain. Respondent State: Spain. Judgment date: 9 dez. 1994. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 1994. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-57905. Acesso em: 23 mar. 2022.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction). Case of McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom. 1998. Respondent State: United Kingdom. Judgment date: 9 jun. 1998a. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 1998a. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58175. Acesso em: 8 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom. Respondent State: United Kingdom. Judgment date: 9 jun. 1998. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 1998b. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=002-6863. Acesso em: 8 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Decision. Asselbourg and others vs. Luxembourg. Respondent State: Luxembourg. Decision date: 29 jun. 1999. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 1999. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-5647. Acesso em: 14 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction). Case of Hatton and others v. the United Kingdom. Respondent State: United Kingdom. Judgment date: 8 jul. 2003. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2003. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61188. Acesso em: 8 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Press release. Chamber judgment Vides Aizsardzibas Klubs v. Latvia 27.05.04. Judgment date: 27 maio 2004. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2004a. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press?i=003-1013988-1048313. Acesso em: 13 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction). Case of Taşkın v. Turkey. Respondent State: Turkey. Judgment date: 11 nov. 2004. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2004b. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-67401. Acesso em: 8 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction). Case of Öneryıldız v. Turkey. Respondent State: Turkey. Judgment date: 30 nov. 2004. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2004c. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-67614. Acesso em: 14 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction). Case of Fadeyeva v. Russia. Respondent State: russia. Judgment date: 9 jun. 2005. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2005a. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69315. Acesso em 11 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction). Case of Roche v. the United Kingdom. Respondent State: United Kingdom. Judgment date: 19 out. 2005. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2005b. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-70662. Acesso em: 8 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Decision. Case of Luginbühl v. Switzerland. Respondent State: Switzerland. Judgment date: 17 jan. 2006. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2006a. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-72459. Acesso em: 11 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction). Case of Giacomelli v. Italy. Respondent State: Italy. Judgment date: 2 nov. 2006. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2006b. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-77785. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Case of Murillo Saldias and others v. Spain. Respondent State: Spain. Judgment date: 29 nov. 2006. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2006c. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=002-2963. Acesso em 13 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction). Case of Budayeva and others v. Russia. Respondent State: Russia. Judgment date: 20 mar. 2008. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2008. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-85436. Acesso em: 8 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction). Case of Tătar v. Romania – [Italian translation] by UFTDU (Unione forense per la tutela dei diritti umani). Respondent State: Romania. Judgment date: 27 jan. 2009. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2009a. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-106021. Acesso em: 14 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction). Affaire Branduşe c. Roumanie. Respondent State: Romania. Judgment date: 7 abr. 2009. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2009b. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-92073. Acesso em: 8 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Press release. Grand Chamber Judgment Mangouras v. Spain 28.09.2010. Judgment date: 28 set. 2010. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2010. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press?i=003-3279673-3663265. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Press release. Chamber Judgment Elefteriadis v. Romania 25.01.2011. Judgment date: 25 jan. 2011. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2011a. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=003-3410938-3828553. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction). Case of Kania e Kittel v. Poland. Respondent State: Poland. Judgment date: 21 jun 2011. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2011b. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105275. Acesso em: 14 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (merits and just satisfaction). Case Di Sarno and others vs. Italy. Respondent State: Italy. Judgment date: 10 jan. 2012. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2012a. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108480. Acesso em: 23 mar. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Press release. Chamber judgment Kolyadenko and Others v. Russia 28.02.12. Date: 28 fev. 2012. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2012b. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=003-3860718-4440642. Acesso em:12 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction). Case of Vilnes and others v. Norway. Respondent State: Norway. Judgment date: 5 dez. 2013. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2013. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138597. Acesso em: 11 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction). Case of Howald Moor v. Switzerland. Respondent State: Switzerland. Judgment date: 11 mar. 2014. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2014a. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-141952. Acesso em: 8 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction). Case of Karin Andersson and others v. Sweden. Respondent State: Sweden. Judgment date: 25 set. 2014. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2014b. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-141952. Acesso em: 30 nov. 2023.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction). Affaire Bursa Barosu Başkanliği et autres c. Turquie. Respondent State: Turkey. Judgment date: 19 jun. 2018. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2018. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183860. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Judgment (merits and just satisfaction). Case of Cordella and others v. Italy - [italian translation] by the Italian Ministry of Justice. Respondent State: Italy. Judgment date: 24 jan. 2019. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2019a. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-192164. Acesso em: 2 mar. 2022.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Press release. Judgment Yasar v. Romania - confiscation of vessel used for illegal fishing in the Black Sea. Judgment date: 26 nov. 2019. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2019b. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press?i=003-6572719-8702458. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2021.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (HUDOC). Yevgeniy Dmitriyev v. Russia. Respondent State: Russia. Date: 1º dez. 2020. Strasbourg: HUDOC, 2020. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=002-13024. Acesso em: 11 dez. 2021.
FREDMAN, Sandra F.B.A. Human Rights transformed: positive rights and positive duties. New York: Oxford Scholarship online, 2008.
ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS (ONU). Declaração do Rio de Janeiro sobre Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável (T2). [1992]. Disponível em: https://www.defensoria.ms.def.br/images/repositorio-dpgems/conteudo-nucleos/nudedh/legislacao-internacional/sistema-onu/22_-_Declara%C3%A7%C3%A3o_do_RJ_sobre_meio_ambiente_e_desenvolvimento_-_1992_-_OK.pdf. Acesso em: 8 dez. 2021.
ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS (ONU). Convenção sobre acesso à informação, participação do público no processo de tomada de decisão e acesso à justiça em matéria de meio ambiente: declarações. Jornal oficial, n. L 124, 17 May 2005, p. 0004-0020, 22005A0517(01). Disponível em: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/?uri=celex%3A22005A0517%2801%29. Acesso em: 30 nov. 2023.
PETER, Birgit. Unpacking the diversity of procedural environmental rights: The European Convention on Human Rights and the Aarhus Convention. Nova York: Oxford University Press. Journal of Environmental Law. 2018.
SCHABAS, William A. The European Convention on Human Rights. Nova York: Oxford University Press, 2015.
SHELTON. Dinah. Human Rights and the environment: what specific environmental rights have been recognized. Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, Denver, v. 35, n. 1, January 2006. Disponível em: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1306&context=djilp. Acesso em: 8 dez. 2021.
SHUE, Henry. The interdependence of duties. In: ALSTON, Philips e TOMASEVSKI, Katarina. The right to food. Utrecht: Netherlands Institute of Human Rights, 1984.
UNITED NATIONS (UN). Economic and Social Council. E/C.12/2000/13. Day of General Discussion organized in cooperation with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) : "the right of everyone to benefit from the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production os which he is the author (art.15.1(c) of the Covenant)", Monday, 27 November 2000 Rights : the Limburg Principles on the Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: the Maastricht Guidelines on Violations of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: background paper / submitted by the International Commission of Jurists. Geneva: UN, 2 oct. 2000. Disponível em: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G00/447/04/PDF/G0044704.pdf?OpenElement. Acesso em: 14 dez. 2021.
VAN HOOF, G. J. H. The legal nature of economic, social and cultural rights: a Rebuttal of Some Traditional Views. In: ALSTON, Philips e TOMASEVSKI, Katarina. The right to food. Utrecht: Netherlands Institute of Human Rights, 1984.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Paula Uematsu Arruda
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
